The silent architecture of the prostate: histological perspectives on the neural landscape

Authors

  • Tatiana GLOBA Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Lilian GLOBA Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9743-1680
  • Elina PELIN Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1068-6785
  • Pavel GLOBA Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52692/1857-0011.2025.2-82.29

Keywords:

prostate carcinoma, perineural invasion, S100, stroma

Abstract

The neural network of the prostate plays a key role in regulating glandular and stromal functions, and the interactions between nerve fibers and tumor cells may influence prostate cancer progression. This study included 92 histological specimens, of which 80 were cases of prostate cancer and 12 were controls. The material was processed using conventional techniques and analyzed morphologically and immunohistochemically, with the use of S100 antibody for identifying neural structures. In normal prostate tissue, the neural network was well organized, with fine nerve fibers distributed periacinally and perivascularly, while larger structures were located in the periprostatic soft tissues. In malignant cases, perineural invasion was present in 33.7% of specimens, with increased incidence in poorly differentiated tumors and non - acinar carcinomas. It was frequently associated with desmoplastic stromal changes and the presence of intravascular tumor emboli. These findings support the hypothesis of an active interaction between neural structures and the prostatic tumor microenvironment, and suggest that perineural invasion may represent a relevant morphological marker for assessing tumor aggressiveness.

Author Biographies

Tatiana GLOBA, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

PhD in Med. Sci., Associate Professor

Elina PELIN, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

PhD in Med. Sci., Associate Professor

Pavel GLOBA, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

PhD in Chem. Sci., Associate Professor

References

Ayala GE, Wheeler TM, Shine HD, Schmelz M, Frolov A, Chakraborty S, Rowley DR. In vitro dorsal root ganglia and human prostate cell line interactions: redefining perineural invasion in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2001;49(3):213-223.

Lang RJ, Hashitani H, Tonta MA. Role of autonomic nerves in controlling prostate function and development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Auton Neurosci. 2006;126-127:219-229.

Bismar TA, Lewis JS, Vollmer RT, Humphrey PA. Multiple measures of perineural invasion for prediction of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: An analysis of 423 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(1):28-34.

Debelec-Butuner B, Alapinar C, Varisli L, Erbaykent- Tepedelen B, Gonen-Korkmaz C. Targeting cancer cell-stromal cell interactions in the tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2014;24(1):1-16.

Morrissey C, Vessella RL. The role of tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer bone metastasis. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(4):873-886.

Magnon C, Hall SJ, Lin J, Xue X, Gerber L, Freedland SJ, Frenette PS. Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science. 2013;341(6142):1236361.

Zeng Q, Chen S, You Z, Yang F, Carey TE, Saims D. Invadopodia and enhanced invasion of cancer cells induced by prostate cancer-derived pro-invasive factors. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(3):359-369.

De Wever O, Mareel M. Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion. J Pathol. 2003;200(4):429-447.

Comperat E, Camparo P, Roupret M, Larousserie F, Philippe M, Sèbe P, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the prostate: A histological and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases. Histopathology. 2012;61(4):600-607.

Published

2026-03-26

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories