Integrated pulmonary rehabilitation: multidisciplinary approaches and clinical outcomes in the management of chronic lung diseases.

Authors

  • Paraschiva POSTOLACHE "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital of Iași, Clinical Department of Respiratory Medical Rehabilitation
  • Constantin GHIMUS "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Clinical Hospital of Pneumophthisiology
  • Vlad-Florin OIEGAR "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Elias University Emergency Hospital
  • Catalina-Florina OIEGAR “Marius Nasta” Institute of Pneumophthisiology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52692/1857-0011.2024.2-79.41

Keywords:

Integrated respiratory rehabilitation, chronic lung diseases, multidisciplinary approaches

Abstract

Integrated pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a fundamental pillar in the modern management of chronic lung diseases, aimed at significantly improving the quality of life and overall functionality of patients. According to the latest 2023 American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, PR is defined as a multidimensional set of interventions designed to enhance the physical and psychosocial well-being of patients with chronic respiratory diseases through a personalized approach [1]. This rehabilitative model includes a broad spectrum of measures intended to reduce respiratory symptoms, increase exercise tolerance, and enhance patient autonomy within the context of a multidisciplinary team comprising pulmonologists, physiotherapists, nutritionists, psychologists, and social workers [2].

The origins of PR can be traced back to the 1960s, when physical training was the primary therapeutic strategy for patients with respiratory conditions. Over the decades, as the understanding of chronic lung diseases deepened, this concept evolved substantially, adding essential components such as psychological counseling, nutritional support, education, and social integration, all of which are now standard in treatment protocols [3]. The 2023 ATS guidelines emphasize the necessity of a holistic approach and underscore the central role of personalized rehabilitation programs to meet patients’ individual needs [4].

Physical training, focused on respiratory muscle rehabilitation and general endurance, remains the core of any PR program, with solid evidence supporting improvements in exercise capacity and reduction of dyspnea [5]. Patient education is also central, emphasizing symptom self-management, treatment adherence, and modification of risk behaviors [6]. Psychological support is crucial, given the high prevalence of depression and anxiety among patients with chronic lung diseases, while nutritional counseling contributes to maintaining homeostasis and muscle mass, essential for optimal pulmonary function [7].

Clinical studies highlight the positive outcomes of integrated PR on clinical and functional parameters, including significant reductions in dyspnea, increased exercise capacity, improved quality of life, and decreased hospitalization rates [2]. These benefits are also associated with a reduction in mortality rates, providing conclusive evidence for the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and personalized interventions [3]. In conclusion, integrated PR represents a comprehensive approach essential for optimizing the treatment of patients with chronic lung diseases, with a significant impact on clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Author Biographies

Paraschiva POSTOLACHE, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital of Iași, Clinical Department of Respiratory Medical Rehabilitation

PhD, Habilitated Associate Professor

Constantin GHIMUS, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Clinical Hospital of Pneumophthisiology

PhD Student, Specialist Physician in Pulmonology

Vlad-Florin OIEGAR, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Elias University Emergency Hospital

PhD Student, Resident Physician in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Catalina-Florina OIEGAR, “Marius Nasta” Institute of Pneumophthisiology

Resident Physician in Pulmonology

References

Spruit M.A., Singh S.J., Garvey C., et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 2013; 188(8):e13-e64.

Rochester C.L., Vogiatzis I., Holland A.E., et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Policy Statement: Enhancing Implementation, Use, and Delivery of Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 2015; 192(11):1373-1386.

Nici L., ZuWallack R., Holland A., et al. Pulmonary Rehabilitation: What We Know and What We Need to Know. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev., 2020; 40(5):288-294.

McCarthy B., Casey D., Devane D., Murphy K., Murphy E., Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2015; (2):CD003793.

Spruit M.A., Pitta F., Garvey C., et al. Differences in content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Eur. Respir. J., 2014; 43(5):1326-1337.

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2024 Report. GOLD; 2024.

American Thoracic Society. Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Chronic Lung Disease: ATS/ERS Policy Statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 2023; 207(3):290-299.doi:10.1164/rccm.2023-0001ST

Postolache A.P. Tratat de Recuperare Respiratorie. Editura ETNA, București, 2022

World Health Organization. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd)

Salvi S., Barnes P.J. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in non-smokers. Lancet., 2009; 374(9691):733-743.

McCarthy B., Casey D., Devane D., Murphy K., Murphy E., Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2015; (2):CD003793.

Yohannes A.M., Alexopoulos G.S. Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD. Eur. Respir. J., 2014; 44(3):789-803.

Criner G.J., Celli B.R., Brightling C.E., et al. Benralizumab for the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations. N. Engl. J. Med., 2019; 381(11):1023-1034.

Holland A.E., Mahal A., Hill C.J., Lee A.L., Burge A.T., Cox N.S., et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax., 2017; 72(1):57-65.

Teixeira P.J.Z., Costa C.C., Marques A.S. History and evolution of pulmonary rehabilitation. J. Bras. Pneumol., 2018; 44(5):404-411.

Postolache A.P., Marciniuk D.D. Handbook of Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, 2021

Spruit M.A., Singh S.J., Garvey C., et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 2013; 188(8):e13-e64.

Holland A.E., Hill C.J., Lee A.L. Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD., 2019; 16(4):302-309

Dowman L., Hill C.J., Holland A.E. Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2014; (10):CD006322.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006322.pub4

Flegea C., Lupuleasa D., Mihalache A. [Development of rehabilitation medicine in Romania]. Rev. Med. Cercet. Iași., 2020; 64(2):151-157

Postolache A.P. Tratat de Recuperare Respiratorie – Aspecte particulare. Editura ”Gr. T. Popa”, Iași, 2023

Postolache P., Săndulache Ș., Ghimuș C. Reabilitarea Respiratorie în Era COVID-19 și Experiența unei Clinici de Referință din România. In: Sechele Post-COVID-19 sau Boala Post-COVID-19 Prelungită (Sindromul Post- COVID-19), Coordonator Voicu V. Editura Academiei Române, București, 2021; 163-194

Lee A.L., Cecins N., Hill C.J. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review. Chron. Respir. Dis., 2017; 14(2):73-84.

Lorig K.R., Sobel D.S., Ritter P.L., Laurent D., Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Arch. Intern. Med., 2001; 161(21):2555-2561.

Garcia-Aymerich J., Hernandez C., Alonso A., et al. Effects of an integrated care intervention on risk factors of COPD readmission. Respir. Med., 2007; 101(7):1462-1469.doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.11.002

Puhan M.A., Gimeno-Santos E., Scharplatz M., et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2016; (12):CD005305.

Hwangbo P.N., Kim H.J., Park B.J., et al. Use of machine learning to predict COPD outcomes. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis., 2021; 16:223-230.

Rutkowski S., Rutkowska A., Kiper P., et al. Virtual reality rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Med., 2021; 10(6):1263.

Published

2025-04-18

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories