The concept of cesarean section in the last 10 years

Authors

  • Cerneţchi Olga Departamentul de obstetrică și ginecologie, Universitatea de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”
  • Potacevschi Oleg Departamentul de obstetrică și ginecologie, Universitatea de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”
  • Cazacu Zoreana IMSP Spitalul Clinic Municipal „Gheorghe Paladi”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52692/1857-0011.2021.2-70.23

Keywords:

cesarean operation, frequency cesarean operations, perinatal mortality

Abstract

 The paper addresses a period of 10 years in terms of the evolution of the number and percentage of cesarean operations in total births and their impact on perinatal outcomes. The results of the study showed with certainty that the widening of indications for abdominal births with increasing their incidence contributes to improving indicators of perinatal mortality

References

Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Логутова Л.С. Несостоятельность шва (рубца) на матке после кесарева сечения: проблемы и решения // Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2015. Т. 15. № 3. С. 4-8.

Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С. Современная концепция родоразрешения и перинатальная смертность // Медицинский совет. 2014. № 9. С. 54-58.

Акушерство: Национальное руководство / Под ред. Э.К. Айламазяна, В.И. Кулакова, В.Е. Радзинского, Г.М. Савельевой. М., 2009. С. 1025-1035.

Иванова О.Г., Шалина Р.И., Курцер М.А. и др.Акушерство и гинекология, 2003, №2, с. 29-32.

Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия. М.; 2011. 679.

Степанова Р.Н. Проблемы родоразрешения женщин после предшествующего кесарева сечения. Ульяновский медико-биологический журнал. 2018.№ 3. С. 19-28.

Boatin A., Schlotheuber A., Betran A.P. Within country inequalities in cesarean section rates: observationalstudy of 72 low and middle in come countries. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2018; 73 (6): 333-334.

Spong C.Y., Landon M.B., Gilbert S., Rouse D.J. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110 (4): 801-807.

Lydon-Rochelle M.T., Cahill A.G., Spong C.Y. Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34 (4): 258-266.

Munro S., Kornelsen J., Corbett K. Do womenhave a choice? Care providers and decision makers. Perspectives on barriers toaccess of health services for birth after a previous cesarean. Birth. 2017; 44 (2): 153-160.

Chitulea P., Galeș C., Popa I-C. Conceptul cezarienei în ultimii douăzeci de ani. Materialele Congresului al XV-lea Național de Obstetrică și Ginecologie. București, 2010, p. 48-56.

Wang X., Hellerstein S., Hou L., Zou L., Ruan Y., Shang W. Caeserean deliveries in China. BMC pregnancy and chil birth 2017.17 (1):54.

Betran A.P., Torloni M.R., Zhang J.J., Gulmezoglu A.M. Section WHOWGoC: WHO Statement on Cesarean Section Rates. BJOG: An international journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2016, 123(5): 667-670.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

Issue

Vol. 70 No. 2 (2021): Medical Sciences

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova. Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.