Comparative analysis of visualization methods of malignant tumors and metastases

Authors

  • Simion MARGA Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy; MagnaMed Medical Center
  • Ion MEREUȚĂ Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Veronica SVET Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52692/1857-0011.2024.1-78.31

Keywords:

Whole body DWI-BS, CT, Bone scintigraphy, malignant tumor, metastases, nutraceutical products, nanoparticles, liposomal products

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a comparative analysis of the DWi-BS method vs CT and Bone Scintigraphy in the detection of malignant tumors and metastases. Material and methods. Whole-body DWI-BS examinations and scans of 12 patients with malignant tumors and metastases previously examined with CT and Bone Scintigraphy. Feasibility, Efficacy and Specificity Examinations of DWI-BS vs CT and Scintigraphy. Conclusion. The DWI-BS method is a non-invasive method that ensures patient safety, does not involve exposure to radiation, is affordable, can increase visibility in association with the administration of nutraceutical preparations, nanoparticles, liposomal products. The feasibility of the DWI-BS method was demonstrated in investigations of clinical scans of 12 patients with malignant tumors and metastases.

Author Biographies

Simion MARGA , Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy; MagnaMed Medical Center

Doctor of Medical Sciences

Ion MEREUȚĂ, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Habilitated Doctor of Medical Sciences, University Professor

Veronica SVET, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor.

References

Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Neuen B, Schild HH, Kuhl CK. Sensitivity encoding for fast MR imaging of the brain in patients with stroke. In: Radiology. 2003, 228(3), pp. 669-75. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2283020243.

Cercignani M, Horsfield MA, Agosta F, Filippi M. Sensitivity-encoded diffusion tensor MR imaging of the cervical cord. In: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003, 24(6), pp. 1254-6.

Ichikawa T, Araki T. Fast magnetic resonance imaging of liver. In: Eur J Radiol. 1999, 29(3), pp. 186-210. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(98)00176-4.

Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, Gao YG, An NY, Ma L, Mahankali S, Gao JH. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion- weighted imaging. In: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002, 16(2), 172-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10140.

Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Funatu H, Fukuma E, Narita M. Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. In: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002, 26(6), pp. 1042-6. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00033.

Huisman TA. Diffusion-weighted imaging: basic concepts and application in cerebral stroke and head trauma. In: Eur Radiol. 2003, 13(10), pp. 2283-97. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1843-6.

Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, Haraguchi K, Ito S, Akashi T, Ohashi I. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. In: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 13(5), pp. 757-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1105.

Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. In: Radiology. 2004, 231, pp. 305-32.

Mazumdar A, Siegel MJ, Narra V, Luchtman-Jones L. Whole-body fast inversion recovery MR imaging of small cell neoplasms in pediatric patients: a pilot study. In: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002, 179(5), pp. 1261-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791261.

Published

2024-08-05

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories